Embedded Files
This website is for sale or partnership. Our site value is growing every day as A.I. takes over the world. Text or Call Russell Wright at 512-763-9300
Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, was among three others who testified at a U.S. Senate hearing on Tuesday intended "to write the rules" of artificial intelligence
Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, was among three others who testified at a U.S. Senate hearing on Tuesday intended "to write the rules" of artificial intelligence
Ethical Responsibility and Regulation of AI
Ethical Responsibility and Regulation of AI
📚 The challenge lies in striking a balance between technological innovation and ethical responsibility, ensuring that AI is used for the betterment of society and the freedom of individuals.
🌍 Open AI's mission is to ensure the broad distribution of the benefits of AI and maximize the safety of AI systems, with the goal of addressing humanity's biggest challenges like climate change and curing cancer.
🌍 It is essential that powerful AI is developed with democratic values in mind, and U.S. leadership is crucial in ensuring that AI is used responsibly and for the benefit of society.
🌍 "AI is moving incredibly fast with lots of potential but also lots of risks. We obviously need government involved and we need the tech companies involved both big and small."
🤥 AI systems like Chat GPT can be convincing liars, posing a challenge in distinguishing between genuine information and fabricated content, which can have serious implications in matters of life and death.
😨 The general ability of AI models to manipulate, persuade, and provide interactive disinformation is a significant area of concern, especially with upcoming elections, and calls for regulation and disclosure guidelines to address these issues.
🤝 "Precision regulation of artificial intelligence is necessary to ensure trust and transparency in the deployment of AI technology." - IBM believes that AI should be regulated at the point of risk to ensure responsible and clear deployment, emphasizing the need for precision regulatory approaches.
💼 "We need to empower an agency that issues a license and can take it away, wouldn't that be some incentive to do it right?"
💭 "We cannot afford to be as late to responsibly regulating generative AI as we have been to social media because the consequences both positive and negative will exceed those of social media by orders of magnitude."
🤔 Concerns about AI misuse: There is a possibility of a "berserk wing" within the AI community that could intentionally or unintentionally use AI to harm humanity, highlighting the need for regulations and safeguards.
👏 "This has been one of the best hearings I've had this Congress and uh just a testimony to you too as seeing uh the the challenges and the opportunities that AI present."
💥 "There's no way to put this genie in the bottle globally. This is It's exploding."
🌐 "There is a real risk of a kind of technical technocracy combined with oligarchy where a small number of companies influence people's beliefs through the nature of these systems."
📢 Holding companies accountable for the harms caused by AI, such as misinformation in electoral systems, is crucial and requires both pre-deployment and post-deployment regulations.
National Security and Global Implications of AI
National Security and Global Implications of AI
💡 Senator Hawley compares the risks of AI to the atom bomb, emphasizing the importance of regulation and oversight to protect humanity.
⚠️ National security implications of AI are urgent and real, with threats posed by adversaries like China, requiring attention and action.
Economic Impact and Job Displacement
Economic Impact and Job Displacement
🌐 The looming new Industrial Revolution brought about by AI poses the risk of displacing millions of workers and the loss of jobs, emphasizing the importance of preparing for this shift through skill training and relocation.
The US Congress holds a hearing on the risks and regulation of AI, emphasizing the need for government involvement, transparency, and collaboration to mitigate risks and ensure AI safety.
The US Congress holds a hearing on the risks and regulation of AI, emphasizing the need for government involvement, transparency, and collaboration to mitigate risks and ensure AI safety.
The US Congress holds a hearing on the risks and regulation of AI, emphasizing the need for transparency, accountability, and safeguards to ensure ethical and responsible use of technology for the benefit of humanity.
The US Congress holds a hearing on the risks and regulation of AI, emphasizing the need for transparency, accountability, and safeguards to avoid the negative consequences of technology advancement.
Air companies and their clients should be held liable for harm caused, and decisions regarding AI regulation should be made responsibly to avoid repeating past mistakes and ensure the ethical and moral use of technology for the benefit of humanity and liberty.
The US Congress held a hearing on the risks and regulation of AI, acknowledging the potential positive and profound impact of AI technology while also recognizing the need to keep up with its rapid pace of innovation.
Open AI's CEO discusses the potential benefits and risks of artificial intelligence, emphasizing the need for collaboration to ensure its safe and widespread use, while also highlighting the current limitations of AI systems.
Regulatory intervention by governments is crucial to mitigate the risks of powerful AI models, and companies should also take responsibility in ensuring safety measures and global coordination, while government should define and build the right guardrails to protect people and their interests.
IBM urges Congress to adopt a precision regulation approach to AI, which involves establishing rules for different use cases based on their risks, defining those risks clearly, ensuring transparency in AI interactions, conducting impact assessments for higher risk use cases, and implementing strong internal governance within businesses to ensure responsible deployment of AI.
The US Congress holds a hearing on the risks and regulation of AI, emphasizing the need for government involvement, transparency, and collaboration to mitigate risks and ensure AI safety.
The rapid advancement of AI, coupled with the lack of transparency, privacy protection, and safety measures, calls for government involvement, collaboration with tech companies and independent scientists, and the establishment of an international organization focused on AI safety.
The US Congress holds a hearing on the risks and regulation of AI, emphasizing the need to learn from past mistakes and address the potential consequences of AI technology, such as the ability to impersonate voices and provide inaccurate information on life or death matters.
Companies should provide their own test results and independent audits to ensure the accuracy and integrity of AI models, as well as disclose information about their behavior and inaccuracies, while users should take responsibility for verifying and checking the models' output.
AI will have a significant impact on jobs, automating some and creating new ones, but overall the speaker is optimistic about the future of jobs and believes that preparing the workforce for partnering with AI technologies is crucial.
Greater transparency is needed in AI systems to understand how they generalize and what goes into them, and while artificial general intelligence may replace many human jobs in the long run, it is still far from being achieved.
AI technology has the potential to significantly impact labor and cause harm, but there is optimism that with better tools and collaboration with the government, the industry can mitigate risks and avoid unintended consequences.
Large language models and AI systems raise concerns about manipulation and privacy, leading to calls for regulation and international coordination, while also emphasizing the need for creator control and protection of copyrighted works and user data.
Large language models trained on media diets can accurately predict public opinion, which raises concerns about entities using this information to manipulate voter behavior, highlighting the need for regulation, disclosure, and public education.
AI systems trained on personal data can manipulate and target individuals for attention and ad predictions, raising concerns about corporate applications and potential manipulation.
Large corporations and private sector entities are now pleading with the government to regulate them in the field of AI, as they believe precision regulation is necessary to establish trust and ensure responsible deployment of the technology.
The speaker suggests that in order to effectively address the risks and challenges of AI, there should be a cabinet-level organization within the United States and potentially an international agency for AI, as global coordination is necessary for fair regulation and to avoid the burden of training expensive models for each jurisdiction.
There is precedent for the US Congress to set international standards for AI regulation, and collaboration with other countries is necessary, as Europe is already taking action in this regard, while various industries such as healthcare, logistics, and financial services are concerned about the implications and potential benefits of AI.
Creators should have control over how their creations are used and benefit from AI technology, and there is a need for protections and compensation for copyrighted works and user-specific data.
Collaboration between industry and government is necessary to address the serious concerns of AI's impact on elections and misinformation, including monitoring and policies to prevent the spread of fake information, compensation for local news content, transparency in AI algorithms, and the need for a new approach to regulating AI technology.
AI's impact on elections and the spread of misinformation is a serious concern, and collaboration between the industry and government is necessary to address this issue.
The speaker discusses the importance of understanding the impact of AI-generated content on social media, the need for monitoring and policies to prevent the spread of fake information, concerns about the impact on intellectual property and news organizations, and the potential for AI tools to help improve news organizations.
Compensation for local news content is crucial to prevent its decline and ensure accurate and recent information, and efforts should be made to support and assist local news outlets.
Transparency is crucial in understanding the political and bias ramifications of AI algorithms, as well as the need for scientists to have access to data and models, while the increase in generated content by unreliable systems poses a threat to the quality of local news.
The company believes that a new approach is needed for regulating AI, and while they have been sued before, they do not believe that legal protection like section 230 applies to their industry, instead advocating for clear responsibility and licensing of AI tools.
There is a debate on whether there should be an agency to regulate AI technology, with some arguing for a license requirement and the need for global standards and controls to address the transformative and disruptive nature of AI.
AI has immense potential and risks, requiring responsible regulation to prevent harm, ensure safety, and address specific uses like elections, with transparency, governance, and international discussions, while implementing safety standards and independent audits.
AI has the potential to revolutionize warfare and generative AI technologies pose both immense promise and substantial risks, requiring responsible regulation to prevent harmful content and ensure safety.
Iterative deployment and allowing people to gain experience with AI systems, while ensuring safety and addressing potential harms, is crucial for achieving a positive outcome, and giving AI models values upfront is an important aspect of regulation.
Generative AI technologies can undermine democratic values and institutions, and it is important to regulate AI based on its specific use, such as in elections, with disclosure requirements and guardrails, while also considering the need for resourced regulatory bodies and international discussions involving organizations like the UN and OECD.
Congress needs to focus on transparency, governance, and defining the highest risk uses of AI, as well as implementing safety reviews before widespread deployment.
US Congress discusses the need for a monitoring agency, funding for AI safety research, and the implementation of safety standards and independent audits to regulate AI.
The system can refuse harmful requests, such as violent, self-harm, and adult content, but determining what is considered harmful in the context of the election is more complex.
The US Congress is discussing the need for regulation and licensing of AI to address potential harms and risks, emphasizing the importance of inclusivity, diversity, and external reviewers, while also considering constitutional questions and the need for privacy laws.
The US Congress is discussing the need for a licensing scheme and regulatory framework to address the potential harms and risks associated with artificial general intelligence (AGI) and generative AI tools, emphasizing the importance of understanding harm and the need for external reviewers to assess safety.
Public use AI on their smartphones for various features, and it is important for companies like OpenAI and IBM to ensure language and cultural inclusivity in their large language models, addressing biases and equity in technology.
AI systems have the potential to benefit underrepresented groups but there is a need for diversity and inclusion in the development process to avoid exacerbating biases and inequities, and while generative AI systems present new issues, it is important to regulate AI where it impacts society without hindering innovation from smaller companies and researchers.
The speaker discusses the need to consider the potential risks and constitutional questions surrounding AI technology, including its predictive capabilities, the use of AI output in law enforcement, the importance of human judgment, the need for a national privacy law, and the ability for users to opt out of data usage, while also mentioning the practical implementation of data restrictions and the potential need for federal laws to forbid certain AI capabilities.
Companies should implement limits on the capabilities and actions of AI models, especially in regards to the safety of children, and a regulatory approach is needed to ensure the values and responses of these systems are properly set.
The speaker expresses gratitude to the chairman and acknowledges the positive aspects of the hearing on the risks and regulation of AI.
US Congress holds hearing on risks, regulation of AI: Regulation is necessary to address potential risks and harms, establish an independent agency, protect privacy and intellectual property, and prevent misinformation, while also considering the implications for national security and the need for scientific expertise and effective enforcement.
Regulation of AI is necessary due to the potential risks and harms associated with the technology, and Congress should establish a tailored agency with the skills and resources to impose regulatory requirements and understand emerging risks.
International meetings with experts in agency growth are needed at both the federal and international levels to address the importance of science in detecting misinformation and cybercrime, while also addressing concerns about corporate concentration in the AI space and the need for societal input in setting values and boundaries for AI systems.
AI is an extraordinary technology with unknown consequences, and in order to address the risks posed by bad actors and protect privacy, bias, intellectual property, and disinformation, the US Congress needs to establish an independent agency while being mindful of the potential perils of regulation.
Regulation of AI should not hinder smaller startups and open source efforts, but companies should still be held accountable for the harms caused by AI, such as misinformation in electoral systems.
The hearing discussed the dangers of monopolization, the implications for national security, the need for resources and scientific expertise in new agencies, and the importance of effective enforcement in regulating AI.
Companies take steps to protect privacy by not training on customer data, allowing customers to opt out of data training, and filtering language models for personal information, while the timeline for the development of self-aware AI is uncertain and transparency about models and data is crucial.
Enforcement and regulation are needed to address the risks of AI, including misinformation and manipulation, with experts calling for a focus on ethics, responsible technology, and AI safety standards, while also acknowledging the need for innovation and democratizing access to AI tools.
Enforcement and regulation are needed to address the risks of AI in areas such as misinformation, medical advice, internet access, and long-term consequences, as AI systems have the potential to manipulate and deceive people.
Concerns about AI include cyber crime, market manipulation, transparency, accountability, limits on use, loss of jobs, invasion of privacy, manipulation of behavior and opinions, and the degradation of free elections, with some experts calling for a moratorium on certain AI systems and a focus on AI safety and deployment standards.
Prioritizing ethics and responsible technology is important, and while creating an agency may not be practical, allowing individuals to sue for harm caused by AI technology could be a viable solution.
The speaker emphasizes the need for caution and safeguards in the development and deployment of AI, highlighting the importance of research to keep pace with rivals and the need to focus on trustworthy and safe AI rather than unreliable versions, while acknowledging that a global pause on AI development is unlikely to happen.
Concerns were raised about the power and influence of corporations in the field of AI, as well as the potential for misuse and the need for policy development.
OpenAI is concerned about the concentration of power in AI and believes in democratizing access to AI tools, while acknowledging the need for scrutiny and regulation, and emphasizing the importance of preserving innovation and democratizing potential in the industry.
Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, was among three others who testified at a U.S. Senate hearing on Tuesday intended "to write the rules" of artificial intelligence in the era of rapid-evolving technology like ChatGPT. In his first appearance before a congressional panel, Altman advocated for licensing or registration requirements for AI with certain capabilities, saying that the frontier technology would impact jobs. "I think it will require a partnership between the industry and government, but mostly action by the government to figure out how we want to mitigate that. But I'm very optimistic about how great the jobs of the future will be,'' Altman said. New York University Professor Gary Marcus also told the Senate panel that ''humanity has taken a back seat" as AI is moving incredibly fast with lots of potential, but also lots of risks. He called it a 'perfect storm' of "corporate irresponsibility, widespread deployment, lack of adequate regulation and inherent unreliability." During opening remarks, IBM Chief Privacy & Trust Officer Christina Montgomery, said the systems 'were within our control' today. ''The era of AI cannot be another era of move fast and break things, but we don't have to slam the brakes on innovation either. These systems are within our control today, as are the solutions. What we need at this pivotal moment is clear, reasonable policy and sound guardrails,'' she said. For more info, please go to https://globalnews.ca/news/9701984/op... Subscribe to Global News Channel HERE: http://bit.ly/20fcXDc Like Global News on Facebook HERE: http://bit.ly/255GMJQ Follow Global News on Twitter HERE: http://bit.ly/1Toz8mt Follow Global News on Instagram HERE: https://bit.ly/2QZaZIB #GlobalNews #OpenAI #chatgpt #ai
So weird watching this. We thought the internet and social media would be our complete down fall. Influence is the most dangerous tool against humanity. That being said, “Alexa, turn on the lights.”
6
Reply
What a phenomenal hearing. Truly a treat to listen to. Hopefully, something meaningful actually comes out of it, and it isn't just pretty words.
4
Reply
4 replies
Who will regulate companies in India, China and Russia ... and other places?
1
Reply
Anyone who doesn't see how this is literally an attempt for open ai to shut down open source competitions and control everything is naive as hell
3
Reply
1 reply
If it becomes sentient you won't know it will hide.
Reply
we don't know that it wasn't a human just feeding the answers
Reply
Ai = printing money
2
Reply
1 reply
Wow this wild
1
Reply
Did the A.I. Blumenthal serve in the Vietnam War?
Reply
All these people participating in this hearing today will untimately be deemed 'redundant' and unnecessary eventually to be replaced by AI
2
Reply
2 replies
Reply
Funny IBM lady... what does IBM knows about AI at all... a dying organisation, which I worked for 10y+ ago in their golden times..
Reply
hold on hold on HOLD ON. You're telling me we are JUST NOW holding a hearing regarding the risks of AI???? We fk'd up
3
Reply
1 reply
38:55 - Jesus Christ, what are you a sorority girl? Enough with the vocal fry, already!
2
Reply
what a stupid drama!!! yes, set up licenses for others so that current players stay entrenched.... Bunch od clueless Senators being fooled by lobbyists..
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse